New Delhi: The Supreme Courtroom on Friday upheld the order of the Clear Particular Investigation Group (SIT) of then Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi and 63 others within the 2002 riots within the state and dismissed a petition from Zakiya Jafri, spouse of slain Congress social gathering chief Ehsan Jafri.
A panel of three judges headed by Choose A.
The court docket, which additionally contains Judges Dinesh Maheshwari and CT Ravikumar, stated its attraction was with out basis. She had alleged a bigger plot within the 2002 Gujarat riots.
Congress social gathering chief and former MP Ehsan Jafri was among the many 68 folks killed within the Golberg group of Ahmedabad throughout the violence on February 28, 2002, the day after the Godhra practice was burned. Zakiya Jafri had challenged the SIT clear order in entrance of 64 folks, together with Modi who was the chief minister of Gujarat in 2002. Her petition appealed to the Supreme Courtroom’s October 5, 2017 order dismissing her petition in opposition to the SIT resolution.
On December 9 final yr, the Supreme Courtroom retained its ruling on the petition.
Apart from the petition filed by Zakia Jafri, nobody has raised the finger of accusation in opposition to her within the investigation into the 2002 Gujarat riots, the Particular Investigations Unit stated throughout the Supreme Courtroom listening to.
Her lawyer had beforehand stated that her 2006 grievance associated to a bigger conspiracy the place there was bureaucratic inaction, police collusion, hate speech and unleashed violence.”
On February 27, 2002, 59 folks had been killed when the Sabarmati Categorical’s S-6 van burned in Godhra, sparking riots within the state. On 8 February 2012, the Particular Investigations Unit filed a report shutting down the investigation of incumbent Prime Minister Modi and 63 others, together with senior authorities officers, saying there was “no prosecutable evidence” in opposition to them.
Zakiya Jafri petitioned the Supreme Courtroom in 2018. The petition additionally asserted that after the Particular Investigations Unit submitted a clean-form within the closure report back to the trial decide, Zakiya Jafri filed a protest petition which the decide dismissed with out contemplating “justification.” Benefits “.
The Supreme Courtroom stated in its October 2017 order that the SIT investigation was monitored by the Supreme Courtroom. Nonetheless, she partially allowed her petition in connection along with her request for additional investigation, saying that she might flip to an applicable discussion board, together with the Magistrates’ Courtroom, a bench of the Supreme Courtroom, or the Supreme Courtroom searching for additional investigation.